Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Wentworth's avatar

I find the focus on energy kinda sus.

The key fact is that the factories were unprofitable. But would cheap local energy, by itself, have made the factories profitable? I don't know the numbers involved, but I would guess probably not. Surely energy was not the #1 or #2 expenditure for these factories.

So why were the factories unprofitable, at a time when their equivalents in Europe were often profitable? I don't know, but there are plenty of alternative hypotheses besides energy costs: local skill to build/maintain the machinery, quality of local workers, local capital costs, ...

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?